Dutch court bans sperm donor who fathered at least 550 children

Dutch court bans sperm donor who fathered at least 550 children
A Dutch court docket on Friday banned a person from donating any extra of his sperm after he fathered no less than 550 youngsters in the Netherlands and different nations and misled potential mother and father concerning the variety of offspring he helped to conceive.

A choose at The Hague District Court ordered the halt in an injunction introduced by the mom of a kid conceived with the donor’s sperm and a basis representing different mother and father.

The mom, recognized by the muse solely as Eva, welcomed the court docket’s determination.

A Dutch man has been ordered to cease donating sperm. (Nine)

“I hope that this ruling leads to a ban on mass donation and spreads like an oil slick to other countries. We must stand hand in hand around our children and protect them against this injustice,” she stated in an announcement.

The court docket famous that below Dutch tips, sperm donors are allowed to provide a most of 25 youngsters with 12 moms and that the donor lied to potential mother and father about his donation historical past.

The donor, recognized as Jonathan M. below Dutch privateness tips, offered sperm to a number of Dutch fertility clinics and to a clinic in Denmark in addition to to many different folks he linked with by way of commercials and on-line boards, the court docket stated in its written judgment.

The donor’s lawyer stated in a court docket listening to that he needed to assist mother and father who would in any other case be unable to conceive.

The choose who heard the civil case stated that the donor “deliberately lied about this in order to persuade the parents to take him as a donor,” the court docket stated in an announcement.

The High Court has determined a sperm donor is a parent because he is involved in the child's life.
The High Court has decided a sperm donor is a father or mother as a result of he’s concerned within the kid’s life. (Getty)

“All these parents are now confronted with the fact that the children in their family are part of a huge kinship network, with hundreds of half-siblings, which they did not choose,” the court docket stated, including that this “has or could possibly have negative psychosocial consequences for the children. It is therefore in their interest that this kinship network is not extended any further.”

The court docket stated in an announcement that the case was about “conflicting fundamental rights.

On the one hand, the right to respect for the privacy of the parents and the donor children … and on the other hand, the same right of the donor.”

Adoptive parents from Minnesota in the US have captured the emotional moment they met their baby for the first time after a series of fertility issues. <br><br>
The couple had always wanted three children but struggled to have their third child, describing the previous pregnancies as “brutal”.
Sarah and David Olson took along their friend and photographer Kristen Prosser of <a href=" http://kristenannephotography.com/">Kristen Anne Photography</a>
 to capture the moment they met their daughter for the first time. (Kristen Anne Photography)

IN PICTURES: Adoptive mother and father share emotional images of the second they met their child for the primary time

The court docket dominated that “the interests of the donor children and their parents outweigh the interest of the donor in continuing to donate sperm to new prospective parents.”

The court docket ordered him instantly to halt all donations and stated he should pay 100,000 euros ($166,518AUD) per case if he breaches the ban.

Lawyer Mark de Hek referred to as the ruling “a clear signal and, as far as I am concerned, a final warning to other mass donors.”

Sign up right here to obtain our each day newsletters and breaking news alerts, despatched straight to your inbox.

Source: www.9news.com.au