AI is each a risk and a possibility for journalism, with greater than half of these surveyed for a brand new report saying that they had considerations about its moral implications on their work.
While 85% of respondents had experimented with generative AI corresponding to ChatGPT or Google Bard for duties together with writing summaries and producing headlines, 60% mentioned additionally they had reservations.
The research, carried out by the London School of Economic’s JournalismAI initiative, surveyed over 100 news organizations from 46 nations about their use of AI and related applied sciences between April and July.
“More than 60 percent of respondents noted their concern about the ethical implications of AI on journalistic values including accuracy, fairness and transparency and other aspects of journalism,” the researchers mentioned in a press release.
“Journalism around the world is going through another period of exciting and scary technological change,” added report co-author and venture director Charlie Beckett.
He mentioned the research confirmed that the brand new generative AI instruments had been each a “potential threat to the integrity of information and the news media” but additionally an “incredible opportunity to make journalism more efficient, effective and trustworthy.”
Journalists acknowledged the time-saving advantages of AI with duties corresponding to interview transcription.
But additionally they famous the necessity for AI generated content material to be checked by a human “to mitigate potential harms like bias and inaccuracy,” the authors mentioned.
Challenges surrounding AI integration had been “more pronounced for newsrooms in the global south” they added.
“AI technologies developed have been predominantly available in English, but not in many Asian languages. We have to catch up doubly to create AI systems, and AI systems that work with our local languages,” the report quoted one respondent within the Philippines as saying.
Co-author Mira Yaseen mentioned the financial and social advantages of AI had been concentrated within the world north and its harms disproportionately had been affecting the worldwide south.
She mentioned this was “exacerbating global inequality”, including {that a} “power-conscious framing of world AI improvement and adoption was wanted. — Agence France-Presse
Source: www.gmanetwork.com
