The penalty resolution that led to Argentina’s opening aim in opposition to Croatia has divided the soccer world, with SBS specialists Mark Bosnich and Craig Foster in full disagreement over the referee’s name.
Croatian goalkeeper Dominik Livakovic was penalised within the thirty fourth minute of the World Cup semi-final after the referee decided he had illegally introduced down Argentinian striker Julian Alvarez within the field.
Following an ideal run between Croatia’s defenders Alvarez had discovered himself one-on-one with the goalie earlier than he tried a chip shot.
His effort on aim was cleared away by the Croatian defence nonetheless Alvarez had been introduced down by the keeper within the meantime.
Lionel Messi stepped as much as smash residence the following penalty probability to offer Argentina a 1-0 lead within the match.
Stream Over 50 Sports Live & On-Demand with Kayo. New to Kayo? Start your free trial now >
Despite admitting he was “biased”, Bosnich launched a fierce defence of the Croatian goalkeeper, who was additionally handed a yellow card for his indiscretion.
But Foster was having none of it, difficult his colleague at each flip.
Here’s the way it performed out.
Bosnich: “What is Livakovic supposed to do? He is standing there and Alvarez pokes it past him and he is allowed to stand there. That was a very harsh penalty.
Foster: “No, come on. He came out and fouled him, Boz.”
Bosnich: “I really don’t think that was a penalty. I don’t know what you expect Livakovic to do.”
Foster: “He could come and save the shot but he come to make a challenge.”
Bosnich: “But if he stops, you can’t just jump out of the way because somebody is running into you.”
Foster: “But you don’t have to be there, that is the thing. It is a foul on the player. The ball has gone over, he (Alvarez) can collect it on the other side. So he has to give a foul. The keeper could stay on his right.”
Bosnich: “But he could stand.”
Foster: “He wasn’t standing, he had come out.”
The two former soccer stars ultimately agreed to disagree earlier than watching Argentina fly away with the end in a dominant 3-0 win that despatched them to the World Cup closing.
Speaking after the match Bosnich accepted the penalty name didn’t go near deciding the consequence with Argentina by far the higher group.
“We can talk about the penalty all we want but they were by far the better team,” Bosnich stated.
Bosnich and Foster weren’t the one TV pairing at loggerheads over the penalty resolution, with Roy Keane, Gary Neville and Ian Wright all arguing the identical name on ITV.
“This is not a penalty,” Neville stated.
“What else can he do? He has to make that motion to try and save the ball, he plants his feet.
“If he’d carried on running out and taken out Alvarez then fair enough, but he stops before it and I don’t know if that’s a penalty.”
Wright added: “When you look at it, the centre forward, he’s actually miss-kicked it to be honest. If he hits it and it goes into the goal, the goalkeeper can’t do anything like you say, he’s stopped.”
Keane stated: “Poor defending overall to let him get a run in on goal, but I agree with the lads, I don’t think it’s a penalty, where else are you supposed to go?”
Originally revealed as SBS specialists Mark Bosnich and Craig Foster at loggerheads over Argentina penalty name
