Kevin Pietersen slammed for airing ‘obscene’ Nathan Lyon conspiracy theory

Only Kevin Pietersen may flip one of the crucial brave moments in latest Ashes historical past into an issue.

The former England batsman has been slammed for airing a “bloody obscene” conspiracy about why Nathan Lyon bravely walked out to bat in Australia’s second innings.

The beloved offspinner entrenched himself even additional within the hearts of cricket followers by participating within the match regardless of a major calf pressure that would maintain him out of the remainder of the collection.

He thrilled audiences internationally by becoming a member of Mitchell Starc for a 15-run tenth wicket stand regardless of not having the ability to run between the wickets.

Lyon earned huge cheers from the Aussie dressing room when he struck a boundary and was given a standing ovation by the Lord’s members when he walked again via the pavilion.

But moments later Pietersen was airing a left-field concept about why Lyon had opted to bat with Australia’s lead already previous 350.

Speaking in between innings on Sky Sports, Pietersen questioned whether or not the Australian crew had requested Lyon to bat within the hope he can be hit within the head by a bouncer.

The English crew was completely sending down short-pitched balls and if Lyon was struck by one and concussed, the legal guidelines of cricket would have allowed the guests to switch him with a like-for-like participant.

The suggestion was Australia may swap Lyon – who had no likelihood of taking the sector for England’s run chase – with reserve spinner Todd Murphy, thus giving them an additional bowler to assist push for victory.

Pietersen tried to make clear he wasn’t accusing Australia of something, however cricket followers voiced their displeasure on social media.

Others noticed the opportunity of Australia gaining an enormous benefit from the state of affairs.

Pietersen made headlines earlier within the match when he erupted at England’s efficiency on day one after the selected to bowl.

But this time he wasn’t alone in providing a controversial view on Lyon’s participation.

Former England skipper Andrew Strauss was one other to overlook the second, ridiculing Lyon’s incapacity to run between the wickets as a substitute of celebrating his involvement.

“It’s all very good to show bravery to get out there but if you can’t score a run it’s utterly pointless,” Strauss mentioned in commentary.

“It seems foolhardy to me,” he added. “There’s a guy’s career potentially on the line here.”

Source: www.news.com.au