AFL footballer Tarryn Trindall, higher often called Tarryn Thomas, threatened to ship an intimate video that he and one other individual had taken consensually after his mom was insulted, a courtroom has heard.
But the North Melbourne participant, 23, has walked free with no felony report after he efficiently utilized for a diversion on his downgraded cost of utilizing a carriage service to harass.
Mr Thomas, who performed for North Melbourne on the weekend, attended the Broadmeadows Magistrates’ Court alongside his lawyer Anna Balmer, the place particulars of his actions had been laid out for the primary time.
Magistrate Julie Grainger stated on July 17 2022 Mr Thomas had accused the complainant of being intimate with one other individual by way of Instagram messages.
The courtroom heard in the course of the course of the trade, the complainant had made a reference to Mr Thomas’ mom, which he took as a “slight”.
Magistrate Grainger stated after this message, Mr Thomas informed the complainant he had distributed intimate movies of the 2 of them the place each events had consented to the recording.
The complainant believed the movies had been despatched, however that they had not, Magistrate Grainger stated.
At the start of Tuesday’s listening to, the courtroom was informed that the primary cost had been struck out, which means Mr Thomas’ solely remaining matter earlier than the courtroom was a diversion utility concerning the remaining cost.
Ms Balmer informed the courtroom the offending had occurred when Mr Thomas was “not coping” with the demise of his grandmother.
She stated Mr Thomas was misusing alcohol on the time of the incident, and travelling incessantly to NSW.
She stated her consumer had engaged in a “reactive response” from a perceived “slight” from the complainant, which had “struck a nerve” with the footballer.
Ms Balmer stated Mr Thomas had achieved “everything possible that he could do since the incident,” together with social media coaching, partaking a psychiatrist and dealing as a part-time cleaner at an Indigenous begin up.
The courtroom heard he had no prior convictions, and that the complainant was “supportive” of the diversion utility.
Magistrate Grainger informed the courtroom if Mr Thomas agreed to pay $1000 to a courtroom fund by August 15, the cost can be formally withdrawn.
She stated she was “very happy” to grant the applying for diversion, and that Mr Thomas had labored “really hard to better (himself)” within the wake of the incident.
Source: www.perthnow.com.au
