Sydney coach John Longmire has handed the AFL a brutal actuality test on their objective assessment system after two Blake Acres touched calls value the Swans of their six-point elimination closing loss on Friday night time.
Acres was in a position to get a fingernail to Braeden Campbell’s shot within the third time period on the MCG – with the rating overturned after the umpire initially declared it a objective.
And it was Acres once more who proved the distinction on the objective line within the thrilling closing quarter.
Watch each match of the 2023 Toyota AFL Finals Series earlier than the Grand Final Live & Ad-Break Free During Play on Kayo Sports. Join now and begin streaming immediately >
His diving contact on Errol Gulden’s shot on objective appeared much less apparent on replay, however the mushy name of a behind stood after a prolonged assessment.
When requested immediately if the AFL’s objective assessment know-how was “good enough”, Longmire was remarkably trustworthy stating: “Clearly not”.
But he refused to position blame on the rating assessment system for his facet’s heartbreaking loss.
“We kicked 2.5 in the last quarter – it makes a difference those moments too,” he mentioned in his press convention.
“We need to make better of our chances.
“(Accuracy) is an important stat in footy – speak to Leigh Matthews.
“In the end, you’ve got to take your chances. Unfortunately we just didn’t take the opportunities when we could have had them.”
Longmire mentioned he was but to have a transparent take a look at the 2 touched targets on replay.
“When I’m on the bench, you don’t get to see replays like you guys in the media sit up in the press box,” he mentioned.
“I didn’t know – I don’t know, still haven’t see it.”
Footy commentators have been left divided over the second Acres’ contact.
“Wow. I’m not sure there’s a glove on that,” James Brayshaw mentioned.
“They already reckon they were a bit stiff with one (Sydney).
“I can’t see any evidence of that ball being touched.”
But Richmond nice Matthew Richardson mentioned the mushy name of a behind was the figuring out issue.
“It’s going to be tough to overrule the umpire though,” he defined.
“Could you categorically overrule that? Geez, it would be a brave call.
“I don’t think you can overrule it.
“It’s too blurry to be categoric.”
The second proved a sport changer as Acres was in a position to get out the again down the opposite finish and kick what can be Carlton’s match-winner.
Longmire mentioned he hoped the AFL would decide to improving the objective assessment system shifting ahead.
“You’d like to think so (that the tech will improve),” he mentioned.
“We’ve been on both sides of the fence, haven’t we.
“We spend a fair bit trying to get things right.”
The Swans scraped into the finals because of a objective assessment controversy in Round 23 when Crow Ben Keays’ objective was not reviewed to provide his facet the lead late in opposition to Sydney – as an alternative referred to as a behind.
Sydney ended up holding on within the closing seconds to say the important four-points. But they weren’t on the correct facet of the evaluations on Friday night time as they bowed out of the finals race.
Originally printed as Swans coach’s blunt evaluation of AFL’s rating assessment as two essential touches show pricey
Source: www.news.com.au
