The AFL group has reacted swiftly after Collingwood’s Brayden Maynard was cleared by the Tribunal in a greater than four-hour listening to, nevertheless it’s clear the group continues to be divided by the choice.
Evidence was heard for 3 hours earlier than an hour of deliberations however the Tribunal discovered that Maynard’s motion was “reasonable” after his smother on an Angus Brayshaw kick went so mistaken.
Watch each match of The 2023 Toyota AFL Finals Series earlier than the Grand Final Live & Ad-Break Free During Play on Kayo Sports. Join now and begin streaming immediately >
It was the primary quarter of Thursday evening’s qualifying last when Maynard tried to smother, however collided with Brayshaw, leaving the Demons star reportedly unconscious for 2 minutes.
While it was nice news for the Collingwood trustworthy, it’s doubtlessly not over with the AFL capable of ship it to the appeals board.
It wouldn’t be a stunning transfer both after AFL government normal supervisor of soccer Laura Kane despatched the soccer world right into a frenzy after sending the incident on to the Tribunal below her title slightly than below Match Review Officer Michael Christian.
But because it stands, Maynard will have the ability to play in subsequent week’s preliminary last towards the winner of Port Adelaide and GWS on the MCG.
It clearly went down effectively with former Collingwood president Eddie McGuire, who was at a dinner.
Ex-Collingwood and Carlton star Dale Thomas posted a video on Instagram Stories with McGuire standing up and tapping his glass earlier than saying: “Ladies and gentlemen, justice has been done. Brayden Maynard is free to play for the Pies.”
One of the individuals at his desk added by laughter: “Sit down dad.”
Collingwood GM of soccer Graham Wright spoke after the choice and handed effectively needs to Brayshaw.
He stated it had been a “long four or five days” for the membership and Maynard.
Asked if the membership had achieved any work if the AFL do problem the choice, Wright stated: “That’s up to the AFL.
“I think that’ll be tomorrow if that’s the case. But we thought Jeff Gleeson’s (AFL Tribunal chair) summation of the Tribunal hearing and what we put forward as evidence and what the AFL put forward as evidence was really clear. So we’re hopeful that this is it.”
AFL 360 host Gerard Whateley stated that he didn’t imagine the AFL would go down the trail of sending it to the Appeals board.
“I think that was thoroughly tested, the rules against the incident, the two cases on merit, there were no errors that I could detect,” Whateley stated.
“I think they did their bit, they put it up, Collingwood’s defence proves too strong, leave it be.”
But Hamish Brayshaw, the brother of Angus who pointed to the very fact the consequence would have “set a precedent for a long time, whether he gets off or whether he doesn’t”, stated the AFL ought to attraction.
Speaking on SEN’s Sportsday, Hamish stated: “I probably would be .
“I think if it went not guilty and no one appealed it from their end, I think it would be a little bit of an injustice because if it goes the other way, I’m sure Collingwood will be appealing it,” he stated.
“I’m not over the ins and outs of the Tribunal but if you leave the ground and make contact with the face, you knock someone out, that’s been the way it’s been.
“I understand it’s different with the pressure of a final and all the rest of it … there’s been a lot of people say it’s going to set a precedent and it’s divided a lot of people.
“For me, really at the end of the day, that doesn’t bother me as much of the outcome of (Angus’) health but it’s certainly one I’ll be paying close attention to.”
Social media rapidly erupted and continued to be simply as divided because it has been all week.
However, Port Adelaide 300-gamer Kane Cornes hit out on the AFL’s arguments after the league’s counsel Andrew Woods claimed that conduct was “unreasonable” and questioned why Maynard didn’t leap extra upright and will have both saved his arms up or cushioned the blow by wrapping his arms round Brayshaw.
Cornes clearly disagreed.
“I think Brayden Maynard’s done a pretty good job – from what I’m reading in the live updates – in his evidence to defend himself … he’s basically said it was an instant decision … he’s calling it a flinch and it is more of a flinch than a brace or anything,” Cornes advised SEN’s Sportsday.
“(But) Andrew Woods for the AFL has been very unrealistic with what he’s suggesting Brayden could have done.
“Does he (Woods) not understand the trajectory of running at 22km/h? You can’t run that fast, stop then jump upright. Clearly your momentum is going to carry you forward.
“It’s one of the more ridiculous arguments I’ve heard. That’s not personal, that’s just my view.
“Have you played the game? Have you run full speed trying to do the same thing or are you just watching it in slow-mo on a TV screen?”
Similarly, earlier than the choice was handed down Gerard Healy questioned the decision from Kane to refer it on to the Tribunal.
“How can Laura Kane call Brayden Maynard’s incident a bump, when the AFL were happy to accept Tom Lynch’s was a brace just a few months ago. It’s illogical and reeks of rules on the run, which as far as a player is concerned is chaos leading to potential injustice,” Healy stated.
Gleeson and the Tribunal discovered “We are not at all satisfied that a reasonable player would have foreseen that violent impact or impact of the type suffered by Brayshaw was inevitable or even likely.”
The discovering additionally claimed Maynard was “not careless in either his decision to smother or the way in which his body formed”.
While additionally citing proof of biomechanist Professor Michael Cole, who said: “Once airborne, Maynard had no opportunity to avoid the collision.”
He additionally stated that Maynard’s physique place when he appeared to brace himself wasn’t a acutely aware resolution and that after he jumped, he was “essentially a projectile”, “like a frisbee with arms and legs”.
Source: www.news.com.au
