Debate set to rage after AFL Tribunal clears Maynard

Debate set to rage after AFL Tribunal clears Maynard

The airborne smother stays alive after Collingwood defender Brayden Maynard escaped suspension for the collision that knocked out Melbourne midfielder Angus Brayshaw.

Debate is ready to rage after Maynard was cleared of wrongdoing throughout a marathon four-hour listening to on the AFL Tribunal on Tuesday night time, releasing him to play in Collingwood’s preliminary last subsequent week.

Brayshaw will miss Melbourne’s semi-final in opposition to Carlton – and should not play once more below a worst-case situation – after being clattered into by an airborne Maynard.

Maynard had leapt into the air in an try and smother the ball and turned his physique on the final second in a motion that resulted in his shoulder making contact with Brayshaw’s head.

Melbourne coach Simon Goodwin stated the tribunal case would outline what gamers’ obligation of care regarded like in such “football acts”.

AFL counsel Andrew Woods argued Maynard had breached his obligation of care by deciding to smother in such a harmful method.

He additionally argued Maynard had made a aware determination to bump after realising contact could be made.

But the AFL Tribunal of chairman Jeff Gleeson, Scott Stevens and Darren Gaspar discovered Maynard’s actions had been “reasonable”.

AFL Match Centre

“He committed to the act of smothering when he was … several metres from Brayshaw,” Gleeson stated in his findings.

“We are not at all satisfied that a reasonable player would have foreseen that violent impact, or impact of the type suffered by Brayshaw, was inevitable or even likely.”

Maynard claimed he by no means made a aware determination to bump.

Instead, he stated it was merely him flinching and seizing up.

Collingwood additionally known as upon a biomechanics and neuroscience skilled to provide proof that Maynard was extremely unlikely to have had sufficient time to decide to bump.

Woods maintained as a substitute of turning his physique, Maynard ought to have both put his palms out to cushion the blow or opened up his arms to gather Brayshaw.

But even when Maynard had completed both of these issues, Woods conceded it might need nonetheless resulted in a reportable offence.

Gleeson stated gamers merely could not assess all of the totally different choices obtainable to them in such a brief time frame.

“It’s asking a lot of a player to decide in a fraction of a second which of various ways to land in a high-speed collision, and which of those ways of landing might result in which type of reportable offence,” Gleeson stated.

“We find he was not careless in either his decision to smother, or the way in which his body formed after his smother.”

Melbourne have sought assist from concussion specialists to supply additional help within the administration of Brayshaw’s damage.

No time-frame has been set for his return.

Carlton’s Jack Martin was in a position to scale back his two-match ban for hanging Sydney’s Nick Blakey down to at least one sport, which means he might be obtainable to play within the preliminary last if the Blues make it that far.

Source: www.perthnow.com.au