Big Pineapple has court win over disputed $5.5m debt

Big Pineapple has court win over disputed .5m debt
The Big Pineapple has received the newest spherical in a $5.5 million authorized battle that would liquidate the business behind the 16-metre-high Queensland vacationer attraction.
The Brisbane Supreme Court on Monday granted an utility by Big Pineapple Corp to put aside a statutory demand that the corporate repay a disputed debt of $5,533,000 together with curiosity.

A statutory demand is a creditor’s formal, written request requiring an organization to pay a debt of no less than $4000 inside 21 days or face a possible courtroom order to declare the corporate bancrupt and wind it up.

Woombye, Queensland, Australia - December 17, 2017. 16m-high Big Pineapple in Woombye, with buildings and vegetation.
The Big Pineapple was in-built 1971 to showcase Queensland’s agriculture to vacationers. (Getty)

The demand was filed by Brad Rankin and his Brisbane corporations Rankin Investments and Rankin Super, which entered right into a three way partnership with Big Pineapple Corp in 2011 for the event of land across the attraction at Woombye, on the Sunshine Coast hinterland.

The Big Pineapple was in-built 1971 to showcase Queensland’s agriculture to vacationers and the location now features a zoo and rainforest excessive ropes course.

Rankin demanded in April final 12 months that his funding be repaid after his companions within the three way partnership, Peter Kendall and CMC Property, refused to help his plan to promote the vacationer attraction to nationwide property developer Scott PDI for $35 million.

Kendall, of Brisbane, stated his place was “the Pineapple is not for sale”.

Justice Soraya Ryan dominated that there was a “genuine dispute” over the $5.5 million.

Coastline at Dicky Beach in Caloundra on Queensland's Sunshine coast
The massive pineapple is 10km west of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland. (Getty)

“I find that there exists a plausible contention, which requires investigation, that the debt was not due and payable on 30 June 2022,” Justice Ryan stated.

Rankin himself agreed in cross-examination that, from November 29, 2012, he understood that the Rankin Super mortgage was not going to be repaid except the three way partnership ended, or he left the three way partnership, the decide stated.

Source: www.9news.com.au