Australian neurosurgeon Dr Charlie Teo says he has no combat left and plans to hold out his sophisticated mind stem surgical procedures in China, after being handed a raft of strict practising situations earlier this week.
On Wednesday, a choice was lastly handed down on allegations Dr Teo’s misconduct in opposition to two sufferers he carried out catastrophic surgical procedures on.
Dr Teo, who had confronted severe complaints over his skilled conduct on the Prince of Wales Private Hospital in Sydney in 2018 and 2019, was advised of the findings through e mail.
He has maintained denial relating to the complaints and allegations of unprofessional conduct and is reportedly weighing up an enchantment.
“In terms of the complaints, if they found me guilty then I have to take that on the chin,” he beforehand advised Seven’s Spotlight program.
The committee has positioned restrictions on Dr Teo, which embrace a requirement to acquire written permission from a Medical Council-approved neurosurgeon with no less than 15 years expertise as a registered specialist in neurosurgery earlier than he performs any “malignant intracranial tumour and brain stem tumour surgical procedures”.
Speaking completely to the Daily Telegraph, the surgeon revealed he had all however given up on working in Australia, claiming he has been “crucified” by authorities.
“I am not guilty of what I am accused of, I reject what they say I have done, they just don’t believe me, so why would I show remorse for something that I deny?” he advised the publication.
“I could appeal, I think I would win. They wouldn’t be able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the things they have accused me of because they are not true. But I’m not sure I have the strength to run an appeal. Furthermore, I don’t have the money to do so,” he mentioned.
“And then the whole emotional turmoil.”
Dr Teo as an alternative revealed he would search to proceed practising abroad.
“I have just been granted privileges in China, in three different hospitals,” he mentioned.
Dr Teo confronted a prolonged listening to in Sydney earlier this 12 months earlier than the Health Care Complaints Commission (HCCC).
He was joined by crowds of supporters, together with high-profile boxing nice Anthony Mundine.
Both sufferers had been “vulnerable women” who confronted the prospect of loss of life from their respective mind tumours.
The committee discovered Dr Teo “did not exercise appropriate judgment in proceeding to surgical resection” within the first lady, Patient A’s case.
“It was high risk and inappropriate surgery by reason of the nature and location of the tumour, its genetic type, and it was diffuse,” the committee’s judgment states.
Read the total unique interview by Cydonee Mardo – a former affected person of Dr Teo – within the Daily Telegraph
The committee additionally discovered the surgical procedure’s potential detriments “far outweighed” any potential advantages, was not supported by medical literature and that Dr Teo had an “overriding ethical duty” to refuse surgical procedure required by the code of conduct for surgeons.
“We have found his judgment was flawed in offering surgery to Patient A,” the committee’s judgment states.
“His answers in both his written material and his oral evidence, while disclosing a willingness to examine and take responsibility for bad outcomes, demonstrated a lack of nuanced appreciation of the vulnerability of his patients and likely flaws in their consent or patient autonomy.”
For the second lady – Patient B – they discovered Dr Teo “carried out surgery which was different to that proposed to the patient”.
“The surgical strategy led to unwarranted and excessive removal of normal functional brain,” the committee’s judgment states.
“A number of elements relative to informed consent were lacking.”
Dr Teo additionally charged Patient B $35,000 for the surgical procedure – one thing discovered to be “inappropriate” and constituting improper conduct within the circumstances of the girl being in a state of “vulnerability”.
He additionally used inappropriate language, telling Patient B’s daughter in a cellphone name: “You’re asking the wrong f**king question”, and “Would I do it all over again? F**king oath I would. You should be grateful. I’ve given the family extra f**king time.”
The committee additional discovered Dr Teo had proven a “lack of reflection” in his judgment in providing surgical procedure “without supporting statistical data or peer support, which, in his own experience, may or may not be proved to have been in error in 10 years’ time”.
“While the practitioner expresses sorrow and takes responsibility for bad surgical outcomes, he does not express any remorse for offering surgery to Patient A or Patient B,” the judgment states.
“This lack of insight into his judgment causes us concern.”
— with NewsWire
Originally printed as Charlie Teo reveals subsequent transfer after bombshell discovering
Source: www.dailytelegraph.com.au
