Why does Disney think photorealistic animals are a good idea? No, really?

Why does Disney think photorealistic animals are a good idea? No, really?

It’s 2023 and we thought we’d settled the entire debate over the uncanny valley. We don’t prefer it. It’s bizarre.

And whereas the animation studios have stopped making an attempt to foist photorealistic CGI people on us, it hasn’t stopped them from doing the identical with the animal kingdom. Please, have mercy on us, it’s been a tricky few years. We can solely take a lot.

The upcoming dwell motion model of The Little Mermaid has real-life people in it (phew) however the design for beloved characters Flounder and Sebastian are upsetting the sorts of responses that had been as soon as reserved for The Polar Express.

Instead of the cute guppy and the comically exasperated crab, there are two marine creatures that appear to be they actually might belong in an aquarium tank in a Las Vegas on line casino. But realism isn’t the purpose. We don’t need realism in our Disney fairytales, so please cease.

We don’t need Flounder trying like a useless gray fish or Sebastian as one thing that may truly be served at a buffet, surrounded by suspicious sashimi.

And contemplating there’s one thing severely odd about The Little Mermaid’s darkish color grading, they don’t even appear to be engaging seafood.

Where’s the color? Where’s the life? Where are our cute sidekicks?

The backlash was ferocious when the primary trailer and character posters for the movie, directed by Rob Marshall, dropped final month, however now with the discharge of a clip from the tune, Kiss the Girl, this week, it solely bolstered that this may very well be a nightmarish enterprise.

Look at these two photographs of Flounder and Sebastian from the clip. Flounder has much less life than a Big Mouth Billy Bass belting out, “Don’t worry, be happy.” Flounder appears sickly, and about two seconds from being stomach up. Why do they hold doing this?

The lesson from the dwell motion remake of The Lion King shouldn’t have been, “We can make anything and it’ll still pull in $US1.66 billion”. It ought to have been that photorealistic animals aren’t enjoyable to observe. Lions don’t bodily emote, and neither do crabs and fish.

You know who does emote? Cartoon Flounder. Nemo. Even Blinky from The Simpsons was extra animated.

OK, so the film hasn’t been launched but, and there’s each probability that perhaps it really works throughout the longer context, as a substitute of a glimpse right here or there in a trailer and a few tune clips.

And the voice actors – Daveed Diggs as Sebastian and Jacob Tremblay as Flounder – are each proficient thespians, so perhaps while you marry the 2, it gained’t be so ghoulish.

Tremblay, who additionally voiced the title character in Pixar’s Luca, has argued that audiences ought to give it a shot. He defended the design to The Hollywood Reporter.

“I thought it was really cool, because I liked how they were kind of doing it, like make them look like real animals.

“Then in the rehearsal too, I had seen the other characters’ designs. I thought it was really cool. And then I got to see the movie last night, and I thought they worked really well, and I can’t even imagine a different way, if that makes sense.

“I think it worked perfectly, I think they were smart about it. I think people should see the movie and then make the judgment.”

The Little Mermaid is in cinemas on May 26.

Source: www.news.com.au