Why inflation is a zero sum game

Why inflation is a zero sum game

Doug asks: If inflation is a society-wide drawback, why is our solely response to take cash from a particular group (mortgage-holders) and provides it to a particular business (banking)? I learn an ABC article that advised it might be fairer and simpler to let folks stash that cash in one thing like tremendous (which reduces folks’s spending) so it nonetheless belongs to them and might move again into the economic system by means of spending as soon as the disaster has handed. What are your ideas?

Barefoot responds: I feel it’s a deliciously easy resolution — and it’ll completely not work.

Mainly, and most boringly, as a result of the extent of our rates of interest — relative to different international locations — determines the worth of our greenback. If we maintain our charges low, our greenback will probably be hit, which can make all the pieces we import dearer.

My view is that the true drawback we’re grappling with is that cash ought to by no means have been priced at zero.

That determination — which was pushed by central bankers all over the world, not simply the RBA — was pure insanity. It fuelled a mania in housing and the share market (and, within the late levels, even in garbage like Dogecoin). The web outcome? The wealthy acquired richer, the poor acquired screwed, and a complete era has been priced out of the property market.

And now you need low revenue earners to bail you out? Because that’s successfully what would occur. Those folks on the backside of the revenue ladder, who’re fighting the price of hovering grocery costs and hire, could be pressured to take dwelling even much less of their weekly pay packet (as a result of they’d be pressured to place extra into tremendous), to allow them to save owners’ (and their landlords’) backsides.

Good luck with that!

Source: www.perthnow.com.au