Tas stadium site only supports ‘lightweight structures’

The Tasmanian authorities stays assured within the website for its proposed new stadium after a report discovered the bottom at Macquarie Point could possibly be unsuitable.

The geotechnical report, commissioned in 2015 and launched on Friday, casts doubt over the flexibility to construct a fully-roofed, 23,000 seat stadium on the website.

Commissioned by geotechnical consultants Douglas Partners, the report discovered the bottom had “poor geotechnical properties” and was solely appropriate to assist “lightweight structures that are non-settlement sensitive”.

Steel pile foundations would have to be dug 18m into the bedrock beneath the positioning “for all settlement-sensitive buildings/structures”.

“This could include 1-2 storey buildings and certainly buildings that are of 3 levels or greater,” the report mentioned.

The report additionally discovered groundwater sits between two and 5 metres beneath the floor of the positioning.

Tasmanian Premier Jeremy Rockliff mentioned he remained assured within the $715 million undertaking on Saturday, arguing the federal government would work by the problems.

“We’re positive, we’re not blockers and we get on with a job and I’m very confident that we can build a stadium,” he advised reporters in Hobart on Saturday.

“We’ve got legislation already through the parliament and then we can get on to planning the economic, the social, the environmental, and everyone can have their say.”

The Tasmanian opposition mentioned the report casts “serious doubt” over the undertaking, significantly the flexibility to ship it on time and inside funds.

“If it is possible that a stadium can be built there it will require a horrendously expensive engineering solution,” Tasmanian Liberal member Shane Broad mentioned.

Construction of the $715 million 23,000-seat roofed waterfront stadium was a situation of the AFL granting a licence to Tasmania for anticipated entry within the competitors in 2028.

A parliamentary committee in early September discovered the Tasmanian authorities didn’t seek the advice of with key stakeholders earlier than asserting the positioning for a proposed stadium.

Source: www.perthnow.com.au