‘Leave them’: Surprise call on Stage 3 tax cuts

‘Leave them’: Surprise call on Stage 3 tax cuts

A former Treasury boss who led the final main assessment of Australia’s taxation system says the controversial stage three tax cuts that can profit the best earners ought to keep.

Ken Henry says he understands why politically it could be name to axe the cuts because of come into impact in July subsequent yr, he stated Australia’s income base mustn’t depend on the non-public revenue tax system.

“As far as I’m concerned, I’d leave them as they are. They’ve already been legislated. They are consistent in their framing with what we recommended in our tax review, published 12 years ago,” Dr Henry advised ABC TV’s 7.30 program on Wednesday.

“It’s not in the personal income tax system where the effort has to be made. It’s in the other components of the tax system where the effort has to be made to raise more revenue.”

Former NAB chair and Treasury secretary Ken Henry says there’s no reason to axe the stage three tax cuts.
Camera IconFormer NAB chair and Treasury secretary Ken Henry says there’s no purpose to axe the stage three tax cuts. Credit: Supplied

The stage three tax cuts, because of come into impact in July 2024, largely have an effect on medium to high-income earners and are set to price $254bn over 10 years.

Stage three includes abolishing the 37 per cent marginal tax bracket for these incomes $120,000 to $180,000 and making a flat price of 30 per cent for these incomes between $45,001 and $200,000.

12/10/2008: PM Kevin Rudd chairs a second day of a special meeting of the Strategic Priority and Budget Committee in the Cabinet Room of Parliament House in Canberra today. L to R: Treasury Secretary Ken Henry; PM Rudd; David Tune, head of Domestic Policy Dept of Prime Minister and Cabinet (PM&C).
Camera IconKen Henry led the final main assessment of the tax system for then prime minister Kevin Rudd 12 years in the past. Credit: News Limited

Dr Henry stated the tax assessment revealed 12 years in the past said that Australia wanted to position much less reliance on private revenue tax as a income, and extra reliance on different income.

“The particular problem that we confront right now in my view in placing too much reliance on the personal income tax system is the intergenerational inequity that it sets up,” he stated.

“We must be taught to have the ability to dwell with a tax system that generates extra income from extra dependable bases which might be extra equitable, significantly for youthful folks, and which do much less injury to the economic system‘s growth prospects.”

Dr Henry told 7.30 spending has been out of control for at least the past 10 years.

“At the same time, the growth rate of the economy, at least in GDP per capita terms and productivity, has been as bad as at any time in our history, apart from the recession of the early 1980s and the early 1990s,” he said.

Dr Henry said the Albanese government’s current announcement a few tweak to the superannuation didn’t go far sufficient to handle the difficulty.

The authorities has introduced Australians with greater than $3 million of their superannuation accounts would have their concessional tax price doubled from 15 per cent to 30 per cent from 2025.

“Those that are being proposed raise something of the order of $2 billion. Clearly that is a drop in the bucket compared to the $50 billion at least that needs to be raised in additional revenue,’ Dr Henry said.

“We’re going to need many measures of that sort if this is how we’re going to address the problem by incremental change here and incremental change there and so on.

“ We’re going to need 20 or 30 such measures in order to address the fiscal challenge that we confront.”

Dr Henry, who ran the Treasury division from 2001 to 2011, led the Henry Tax Review in 2009 which was just about ignored after the Resource Super Profits Tax initiative was shouted down,

Source: www.perthnow.com.au