Labor rejects ‘tricky’ Anzac accusation

Labor rejects ‘tricky’ Anzac accusation

Labor frontbenchers have rejected solutions the federal government intentionally timed the discharge of a landmark defence assessment to hyperlink it to Anzac Day.

Some Coalition MPs have criticised the federal government’s resolution to launch a declassified model of the Defence Strategic Review on the eve of the nationwide day of commemoration for Australian servicemen and girls.

They argue the federal government has used the timing to deflect from its $19bn overhaul of the Australian Defence Force involving cuts to some present army packages to cowl the fee within the quick time period.

But Veterans’ Affairs and Service Personnel Minister Matt Keogh stated the federal government merely wished to make its plans for a defence overhaul public earlier than the federal finances early subsequent month.

“The timing was really about, as we said, that we’re committed to releasing this before we got to the budget, which is only a few weeks away now,” he informed ABC Radio from Gallipoli on Monday morning.

Defense Strategic Review
Camera IconDefence Minister Richard Marles has responded to criticism about chopping an present military program. NCA NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia

Opposition assistant defence spokesman Phillip Thompson stated he was “appalled” the Defence Strategic Review had been launched the day earlier than Anzac Day, labelling the federal government “out of touch”.

“I think that this prime minister is so out of touch is disgraceful and disrespectful for what he did,” the military veteran and Herbert MP informed Sky News on Monday.

Mr Thompson questioned if the federal government had intentionally timed the discharge of the assessment to attempt to keep away from scrutiny over its resolution to chop the variety of infantry combating autos the military shall be geared up with.

The authorities has stated the response to the strategic assessment will value $19bn over the subsequent 4 years, which incorporates the $9bn in spending already introduced to fund the AUKUS nuclear-powered submarines.

About $7.8bn will come from financial savings made by means of the gutting, delaying or cancelling of quite a few present Defence initiatives.

The military had deliberate to accumulate as much as 450 infantry combating autos, at a price of as much as $27bn, however this quantity is about to be slashed to only 129 autos according to the assessment’s suggestions.

ANDREW HASTIE PRESSER
Camera IconOpposition defence spokesman Andrew Hastie has raised considerations in regards to the Defence Strategic Review. NCA NewsWire / Gary Ramage Credit: News Corp Australia

Opposition defence spokesman Andrew Hastie on Monday accused the federal government of participating in “tricky politics” by releasing the assessment on the eve of Anzac Day.

He additionally straight raised considerations in regards to the cuts to the infantry car program.

“The Albanese government is using Anzac Day as a smokescreen hoping people would not notice some of these trade-offs and cuts to capability,” he stated.

“But we’re calling them on this magician’s trick. And we will hold them to account over coming days and months.”

Asked to reply to Mr Hastie’s criticism the subsequent morning, Defence Minister Richard Marles stated he didn’t wish to enter a “contest” on Anzac Day.

“I‘d simply say it’s … only one category of fighting vehicle,” he stated.

Mr Marles stated the federal government was in search of to “reshape” and “reimagine” the military to organize it for the difficult strategic circumstances Australia confronted, together with by equipping it with long-range missiles.

Source: www.perthnow.com.au