Key robodebt defender set to face royal commission

Key robodebt defender set to face royal commission

A Social Services division official who others declare insisted the robodebt scheme was authorized will entrance the royal fee on Friday.

Former deputy secretary Nathan Williamson will give proof per week after former fee integrity employee Allyson Essex claimed he advised her it was “really clear” the scheme was lawful regardless of exterior authorized recommendation suggesting the other was true.

“I told (Mr Williamson) about the … advice and said we have got advice that says it’s not legal,” Ms Essex advised the fee final week.

“His response to me was ‘it’s legal, it’s really clear that it’s legal. By all means, if we have a robust advice, let’s evaluate the situation. But it’s legal’.”

The Centrelink debt restoration scheme operated between 2015 and 2019 however continued effectively after important considerations have been raised about its legality.

It recovered greater than $750 million from greater than 380,000 folks and a number of other folks took their very own lives whereas being pursued for false money owed.

The illegal scheme concerned utilizing annual tax workplace information to calculate fortnightly earnings and mechanically challenge welfare debt notices.

The Department of Social Services has been accused of getting a tradition by which workers have been afraid to escalate authorized considerations concerning the scheme.

Ms Essex advised the fee she solely deliberate to inform Mr Williamson concerning the authorized recommendation “when the time is right”, which prompted counsel helping Angus Scott to ask “surely the right time was immediately”.

A associate at a number one auditing agency can even face the royal fee on Friday.

Shane West from PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) will give proof about an exterior assessment former minister Alan Tudge commissioned the agency to carry out in 2017.

At that stage, authorized issues concerning the welfare fee administration system have been rising, with the Commonwealth ombudsman working a separate investigation.

Source: www.perthnow.com.au