AFL footballer Tarryn Trindall, higher generally known as Tarryn Thomas, threatened to ship an intimate video that he and one other individual had taken consensually after his mom was insulted, a court docket has heard.
But the North Melbourne participant, 23, has walked free with no legal file after he efficiently utilized for a diversion on his downgraded cost of utilizing a carriage service to harass.
Mr Thomas, who performed for North Melbourne on the weekend, attended the Broadmeadows Magistrates’ Court alongside his lawyer Anna Balmer, the place particulars of his actions had been laid out for the primary time.
Magistrate Julie Grainger mentioned on July 17 2022 Mr Thomas had accused the complainant of being intimate with one other individual by way of Instagram messages.
The court docket heard throughout the course of the change, the complainant had made a reference to Mr Thomas’ mom, which he took as a “slight”.
Magistrate Grainger mentioned after this message, Mr Thomas instructed the complainant he had distributed intimate movies of the 2 of them the place each events had consented to the recording.
The complainant believed the movies had been despatched, however that they had not, Magistrate Grainger mentioned.
At the start of Tuesday’s listening to, the court docket was instructed that the primary cost had been struck out, which means Mr Thomas’ solely remaining matter earlier than the court docket was a diversion software relating to the remaining cost.
Ms Balmer instructed the court docket the offending had occurred when Mr Thomas was “not coping” with the dying of his grandmother.
She mentioned Mr Thomas was misusing alcohol on the time of the incident, and travelling steadily to NSW.
She mentioned her shopper had engaged in a “reactive response” from a perceived “slight” from the complainant, which had “struck a nerve” with the footballer.
Ms Balmer mentioned Mr Thomas had accomplished “everything possible that he could do since the incident,” together with social media coaching, partaking a psychiatrist and dealing as a part-time cleaner at an Indigenous begin up.
The court docket heard he had no prior convictions, and that the complainant was “supportive” of the diversion software.
Magistrate Grainger instructed the court docket if Mr Thomas agreed to pay $1000 to a court docket fund by August 15, the cost could be formally withdrawn.
She mentioned she was “very happy” to grant the appliance for diversion, and that Mr Thomas had labored “really hard to better (himself)” within the wake of the incident.
Originally printed as Tarryn Thomas fronts Broadmeadows Magistrates’ Court
Source: www.dailytelegraph.com.au
