The case towards Lucy Letby is ‘fuelled by the presumption of guilt,’ a court docket heard yesterday.
The prosecution has ‘twisted’ and adjusted their idea to suit claims the neo-natal nurse, 33, killed and harmed infants in her care, her barrister stated.
Ben Myers KC stated it doesn’t matter what Letby does it’s thought of an affirmation of her ‘guilt’.
He added: “What really is at work is best described as a presumption of guilt and this prosecution case is fuelled by it and riddled by it.
“No matter what Lucy Letby says, does, or doesn’t do it is slotted into the ever-flexible, ever-changing theory of guilt – everything is treated as evidence of guilt.”
Letby, of Hereford, denies the homicide of seven untimely infants and tried homicide of ten others on the Countess of Chester Hospital in Cheshire.
Mr Myers recognized two potentialities for the spike in child collapses and deaths on the hospital from June 2015 to June 2016.
The first was that they had been because of the medical situation of the infants in addition to staffing pressures and failings in care.
The different was {that a} ‘dedicated neo-natal nurse had decided to kill children or try to kill them’ for causes ‘beyond comprehension,’ he stated.
Letby denies a complete of twenty-two costs.
The case continues.
Source: www.perthnow.com.au
