AI cheats slammed by teachers after Chat GPT revolution

AI cheats slammed by teachers after Chat GPT revolution

The synthetic intelligence bot which singer Nick Cave accused of creating a “grotesque mockery” of his work has hit again on the musician by insisting it “tries its best to generate text that is coherent, creative and conveys a message”.

Cave left a scathing overview of ChatGPT’s rendition of his work, describing the lyrics as “bulls…t” and saying the music “sucks” after a fan requested it to copy his type of music.

But what’s ChatGPT (quick for generative pre-trained transformer) and why are some academics and college tutors, in addition to musicians, script writers and even journalists, probably anxious about their jobs?

It is synthetic intelligence know-how, a chat bot that’s stated to have the ability to converse like a human, drawing on lots of knowledge and information to take action, write within the type requested for, reply questions and remedy issues. You kind in a request and it responds.

“A lot of the creative industries have been caught flat-footed by this,” Dr Daniel Susskind, an Oxford professor and writer of The Future of the Professions, concerning the impact AI can have on employment, instructed London’s Daily Telegraph.

“They think there’s something special about a faculty like creativity, but it turns out these systems can solve problems that might require creativity from us, but do it in different ways.”

Teachers concern it’ll result in mass dishonest on homework and exams. Antony Aumann, professor of philosophy at Northern Michigan University, instructed ABC Radio National’s Breakfast program he picked up a cheat “because the essay was too good to be true, better than anything anybody else in my class were able to accomplish and it was too philosophically sophisticated”.