Rape accuser’s shopping trip after alleged attack

Rape accuser’s shopping trip after alleged attack

A girl who alleges she was sexually assaulted by Wallabies star Kurtley Beale within the toilet flew interstate to buy a marriage gown hours later, a court docket has heard.

Beale, 35, is going through a jury trial at Sydney’s Downing Centre Court after pleading not responsible to sexual activity with out consent and two counts of sexual touching.

Police allege Mr Beale groped the girl’s backside on the Beach Road bar in Bondi on December 17, 2022, earlier than forcing her into oral intercourse in a stall within the males’s toilet.

The jury have been advised the 29-year-old flew as much as Queensland the next day.

The girl advised her mother-in-law to-be “Kurtley (Beale) followed me into the toilet and pinned me against the wall and tried to have sex with me”.

In her proof, the mother-in-law stated the girl had advised her fiance “something really weird happened” and he was flying up early to be along with her.

The mother-in-law drove the girl to a police station the place she made a press release to police. On the best way, she additional described the allegation.

“She said ‘He (Beale) was pissed. I don’t think he’d remember … he could hardly stand up, and was pinching me on the arse all night,” the mother-in-law stated.

The girl later added after leaving that “he tried to put his dick in my mouth”, to which her mother-in-law replied: “Why didn’t you bite the f**king thing?”

The jury heard proof from 5 members of the couple’s households on Monday concerning the girl’s earliest allegations, together with her mom and father.

They described her as being “frazzled” and breaking down in tears through the morning after the alleged incident, whereas her father stated she was in “mental anguish”.

“There was fear on her face. Simple,” he stated. “She was holding back from not crying and couldn’t look me in the eye. For me, that’s mental anguish on her part,” he stated.

The girl’s father advised the court docket that her daughter had advised him throughout the identical dialog that she was “scared that because of (Beale’s) profile people will hate us”.

Her mom gave proof that her daughter had alleged she was “sexually assaulted” and her first response was: “Why are you on the plane? Why did you go?”

“She said she had to get away. She had to process what happened. I was concerned about her being away and having to deal with this without us there,” the mom stated.

Under cross-examination, Beale’s barrister, Margaret Cunneen SC, grilled the witnesses about an argument between the girl and her fiance that week.

Four witnesses denied any information of the argument, with the girl’s father stating that she was completely satisfied when the couple arrived in Sydney the evening earlier than.

Only her sister stated there was a disagreement, however it wasn’t “serious”. A good friend current on the evening gave proof there was “tension” between the couple.

The 5 household witnesses additionally gave proof as to the order of occasions on the evening, together with claims opposite to CCTV that the girl entered the lads’s toilet first.

“She told me, ‘I needed to go to the bathroom but left the cubicle unlocked. Someone followed me in and got inside the cubicle’,” the girl’s future sister-in-law stated.

“Someone said can you f**k me? Can you f**k me? He put his penis in my face … I pushed against him and said I’m engaged’. He said, ‘Well f**k off then’ and left’.”

In her proof, the girl claimed Beale had been “forceful” and “desperate” and had requested for intercourse earlier than barging in on her within the males’s stall and locking the door.

In cross-examination, Ms Cunneen prompt to the girl she as an alternative was the one “in control” of the encounter and had used the allegation to get sympathy for her fiance.

An worker who entered the toilet through the alleged incident additionally gave proof they noticed a pair of males’s and ladies’s toes in a single stall however didn’t hear any noises.

The jury earlier heard proof from the girl’s fiance through the second week of the trial, who spoke concerning the pair’s relationship, and have been additionally proven CCTV footage.

The trial will proceed on Tuesday.

Source: www.news.com.au