A girl who alleges she was sexually assaulted by Wallabies star Kurtley Beale in a bar rest room made the accusations to “save her marriage”, his lawyer has claimed.
Mr Beale, 35, is dealing with a jury trial at Sydney’s Downing Centre Court after pleading not responsible to sexual activity with out consent and two counts of sexual touching.
Police allege Mr Beale groped a girl’s backside on the Beach Road bar in Bondi on December 17, 2022, earlier than forcing her into oral intercourse within the stall of the lads’s rest room.
Mr Beale’s barrister, Margaret Cunneen SC, claimed on the finish of her cross-examination on Thursday that the 29-year-old had used the allegation to avoid wasting her “proposed marriage”.
“You decided to use this interaction, that you controlled, to get the sympathy of (your fiance), of your sister and of your family,” Ms Cunneen advised the court docket.
“To put everything that has happened in that week to an end, that is a disagreement with (your fiance) … so he would have to treat you with love and care, and sympathy.”
Ms Cunneen additionally added later: “You made this up for the purpose to save your marriage – your proposed marriage – that you anticipated so excitedly.
The woman denied Ms Cunneen’s claims, including that she had flirted with Mr Beale and that there was a “tenor of affection” earlier than the alleged grope.
The girl put the allegations to Mr Beale in a cellphone name secretly recorded by police a few month later during which Mr Beale admitted he “f**king misjudged” the scenario.
Five pages of handwritten notes made by the lady earlier than the decision had been on the centre of cross-examination by Mr Beale’s barrister, Margaret Cunneen SC, on Thursday.
Ms Cunneen advised the jury the 29-year-old girl had written on the fourth web page of her notes that the aim of the decision was to “convince him he is guilty and not innocent”.
The girl admitted to creating the notes, together with additional said functions for the decision that included that “he (Mr Beale) would be better off if confesses”.
Ms Cunneen advised the lady: “Your purpose, I suggest, was to talk him into thinking he had done something wrong, something criminal.”
Later, Ms Cunneen added: “You thought it would have been better if he had pleaded guilty and had not had your allegations (of sexual assault) tested in a court.”
The girl denied the recommendations, stating: “I knew either way it would have been difficult, (but) it would have saved a lot of heartache, money and time.”
The jury had been additional advised the lady, who can not not be named, had written within the notes to “act friendly, normal” and that she would probably see Mr Beale once more.
Under earlier cross-examination, the lady denied contradictions between her proof in court docket on Monday and in statements to police early final yr.
The girl advised police that she had used the lads’s bathrooms as a result of the road was too lengthy for the ladies’s, and Mr Beale had adopted her into the cubicle instantly after.
Ms Cunneen as an alternative steered that in her proof on Monday, the lady had advised the jury Mr Beale had pushed his means in and had locked the door whereas she was on the bathroom.
“The reason you have changed it, I put to you, is to make it seem worse for Mr Beale that he would barge in on you in the process of going to the toilet,” she mentioned.
The jury earlier heard accusations from Ms Cunneen that the lady had used the allegations to “turn the tables” in her personal relationship and get sympathy.
The girl vehemently denied the declare, in addition to additional recommendations from Mr Beale’s lawyer that she had consented to, and been “in control” of, the alleged act.
In his proof, the lady’s fiance advised the court docket he was closely intoxicated earlier than arriving on the bar that evening, and was unable to recall a lot of the interactions he’d had.
He did although inform the court docket he remembered his fiance telling him Mr Beale had tried to kiss her. He replied “that’s weird”, earlier than the pair left about 10 minutes later.
The man was additionally unable to recall lots of the textual content message exchanged between the pair earlier that evening, however admitted they had been “having a relationship argument”.
He will reappear earlier than the court docket for additional proof on Friday.
Earlier within the week, the jury was advised of the lady’s model of occasions and a name to the rugby star during which she first made the accusation of sexual assault.
During the decision, Mr Beale admitted the pair had “hooked up” earlier than later stating that the accused acts had been “not on”. The jury was additionally proven CCTV footage.
Source: www.news.com.au
