Peter Dutton is the chief of a “misinformation and disinformation campaign” that’s pushing “fear over fact”, in accordance with the federal government.
Tempers flared in Parliament House on Tuesday, as Question Time was dominated by mudslinging over the upcoming Voice to Parliament referendum.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese weighed in on revelations that the No marketing campaign had been partaking in deliberate concern mongering ways, after an internet coaching session was leaked to the Nine Newspapers.
The leaked session revealed the No activist group Advance’s technique to make individuals suspicious of the Voice to Parliament.
According to the tape, volunteers are informed to not establish themselves as No campaigners whereas conducting telephone calls, and lift false stories of compensation being paid to Indigenous Australians ought to a Yes vote rise up.
Having been requested by Coalition MP Phillip Thompson whether or not he had “now read in full” the 26-page file of supporting paperwork to the Uluru Statement from the Heart, Mr Albanese launched an assault on the opposition for conspiring with the “scare” ways of the No marketing campaign.
The Uluru assertion is one web page, Mr Albanese mentioned as he accused Mr Thompson of peddling “nonsense”, earlier than talking concerning the Nine Newspapers article.
He referred to as the No marketing campaign’s ways “a deliberate strategy of promoting fear, fear over fact”.
“The No campaigners are out there saying this: ‘When reason and emotion collide, emotion always wins’, that’s one of the quotes that are there,” he mentioned, making reference to the article.
“There they are, telling their campaigners to promote fear rather than hope. Promote division rather than unity. Promote the entrenching of values rather than the better future. Promote ignoring rather than listening. Promote exclusion rather than recognition.”
Earlier in Question Time, Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus accused Mr Dutton of main the “misinformation and disinformation campaign that is symptomatic of the No campaign”.
His feedback got here after Mr Dutton had requested Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney to substantiate whether or not, in a earlier reply, she had mentioned parliament might override the provisions of the structure.
Ms Burney had mentioned no such factor, and after reminding Mr Dutton of the proposed constitutional reforms, she handed the dispatch field to Mr Dreyfus, who was fast to launch an assault on the Opposition Leader.
“This question from the Opposition Leader shows entirely, on full display, his role as the leader of the misinformation and disinformation campaign that is symptomatic of the No campaign,” Mr Dreyfus mentioned.
“He knows that the constitutional provision is extremely clear.
“(He) will stop at nothing in his campaign of disinformation and misinformation.”
Leader of the House, Tony Burke, then stepped as much as elevate some extent of order – asking Mr Dutton to withdraw his query, as a result of the reside transcript confirmed Ms Burney had made no reference to overriding constitutional provisions.
A back-and-forth ensued, earlier than Speaker Milton Dick mentioned he would cope with the matter after Question Time.
A short while later, Mr Albanese mentioned Mr Dutton had “verballed” Ms Burney and “put words in her mouth”; and hit out on the Coalition for his or her position within the No marketing campaign’s alleged scare ways.
It capped off a day of mudslinging throughout the 2 campaigns.
A Fair Australia spokesman pointed the finger at Voice supporters and claimed they weren’t being “honest” concerning the referendum.
“There are countless examples of Voice architects, activists and campaigners arguing that the Voice is the tool to demand taxpayer-funded compensation, pay reparations for historical wrongs, to force Australians to ‘pay the rent’ and abolish Australia Day,” they mentioned in an announcement.
Earlier, Uluru Dialogue spokesman Roy Ah-See mentioned the ways being employed by the No marketing campaign insulted voters’ intelligence.
“The Australian people are being taken for mugs by the No campaign in a tactic that is distinctly un-Australian,” he mentioned in an announcement on Tuesday.
“The No campaign has no interest in running a fair and open conversation, just like they have no interest in improving the lives of First Nations peoples and all Australians.”
Mr Albanese referred to as out the “cynicism” of the No marketing campaign whereas addressing the Labor caucus on Tuesday morning.
“This is about a request from Indigenous Australians to make decisions with them, not to them. We need to keep talking to as many people as possible in the coming weeks,” the Prime Minister informed his colleagues, in accordance with a Labor spokesman.
Down the corridor, Mr Dutton informed colleagues that Mr Albanese’s subsequent transfer, ought to the referendum be defeated, can be a “test of character”.
“Whatever the outcome of the referendum on October 14 our nation will be bruised,” he mentioned, in accordance with a Coalition spokeswoman.
“(Mr Albanese has) also made it clear that if the referendum is voted down, that he won’t take the issue back up again. Now, either you’re consistent with your views or you are not. It’s a test of character”
The spokeswoman mentioned one MP raised a “genuine sadness” concerning the referendum’s prospects and mentioned October 15 shouldn’t be seen as a celebration, ought to the bulk vote be No.
Source: www.perthnow.com.au
