Aussie mum produces incredible dashcam footage to clear at-fault claim

Aussie mum produces incredible dashcam footage to clear at-fault claim

An Australian lady says she was pressured to offer unimaginable dashcam footage to her insurance coverage supplier to show her daughter was not at fault when her automobile was hit whereas sitting stationary in site visitors.

Lifelong NRMA buyer Jenny instructed Ben Fordham on 2GB she lodged an insurance coverage declare after the entrance of her automobile was clipped in an accident whereas her daughter, an off-duty police officer, was behind the wheel on July 9 on their method again from a snow journey.

She claims an insurance coverage consultant mentioned her daughter was at fault for the crash which broken their automobile, that means she must pay the surplus.

The automobile was clipped throughout a crash on the Hume Highway. This dashcam video helped show Jenny’s driver was not at fault. (2GB)
“When we initially made the claim over the phone she kept referring to it as our car hitting another car, I kept saying to them, ‘No, that’s not correct’,” she instructed Ben Fordham Live on 2GB.

“She was actually stationary in the outside lane, traffic has built up on Hume Highway, she has basically come to a full stop.

“A automobile was developing the within and was clipped by a automobile that attempted to come back into that lane.

“That caused it to roll approximately eight times and it rolled across the front of our car.”

NRMA later cleared Jenny’s daughter of blame after she took dashcam footage to an in-person NRMA workplace proving her innocence – nonetheless, the difficulty nonetheless wasn’t resolved.

Nearly a month later, on August 1, the smash restore firm knowledgeable Jenny that NRMA had denied their insurance coverage declare to repair the paint mix on the automobile.

“They (didn’t) want to blend the paint to the surrounding panels, (but) according to the paint repair guidelines, if a panel’s got to be replaced, then the paint has to be blended to the surrounding areas,” she mentioned.

“One of the doors had to be replaced and the front (panel), but the NRMA wouldn’t allow that to happen.”

The dashcam video was provided to the insurer, who later admitted Jenny's daughter was not at fault.
The dashcam video was supplied to the insurer, who later admitted Jenny’s daughter was not at fault. (2GB/Supplied)

The automobile is near model new and was bought in May for $61,000.

Jenny determined to submit a declare with the driving force at fault’s insurance coverage firm to repair the paint job.

The declare was accepted inside a matter of days.

“It’s been two months of a nightmare,” she mentioned.

“The at-fault insurance company rang me and confirmed all the details … (it was) the identical claim to what we put through to the NRMA.”

The automobile continues to be not prepared two months after the preliminary declare was made.

In an announcement to 9news.com.au, NRMA mentioned it had apologised to Jenny over the incident.

“We understand this accident was a traumatic experience for our customer, her daughter, and their family,” it mentioned.

“When a customer has been in an accident our priority is ensuring that they’re safe and that we make their claims experience as easy as possible.”

“We’ve spoken with our customer today to apologise directly for their experience.

“We will at all times evaluation sprint cam footage to assist decide who’s at fault in an accident and agree this could have been resolved as quickly as that they had lodged their declare.

“We will also take the appropriate steps with the relevant teams to do everything we can to prevent a similar issue happening in the future.”

Source: www.9news.com.au