“No,” Musk tweeted flatly in response to 1 consumer’s name for Jones to be reinstated on Twitter.
Musk elaborated on his place on Sunday night, citing Bible scripture and his personal private expertise with Sudden Infant Death Syndrome to elucidate his opposition to Jones, who has been ordered to pay lots of of tens of millions of {dollars} in damages for his lies in regards to the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School capturing.
“My firstborn child died in my arms. I felt his last heartbeat,” Musk tweeted.
“I have no mercy for anyone who would use the deaths of children for gain, politics or fame.”
The announcement on Jones prompted a flood of replies, with some Twitter customers commending Musk for persevering with to disclaim Jones a platform whereas others, together with a few of Jones’ personal self-professed supporters, mentioned it confirmed Musk’s inconsistent and arbitrary assist for free-speech ideas.
After one Twitter consumer criticised Musk’s determination and expressed disappointment that Jones wouldn’t be allowed again on Twitter, Musk replied: “Too unhealthy.”
In a response video posted Friday to the choice video website Rumble, Jones mentioned he did not care if he was allowed again on Twitter, and listed varied different digital platforms the place his content material stays accessible.
“Don’t blame Musk at the end of the day because he didn’t bring me back,” Jones urged his followers.
“I’m the most controversial figure in the world because I’m the most threatening to the new world order.
“So do not anticipate him to deliver me again on day one.”
On Monday, Georgia Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene said her personal account had been restored after it was banned from Twitter at the beginning of the year for repeatedly violating platform policies on COVID-19.
At the time, Twitter had banned Greene over the sharing of a chart misleadingly linking deaths to the COVID-19 vaccines, despite authoritative scientific research demonstrating the vaccines to be safe and effective.
“My account is again,” Greene tweeted from her official congressional account.
A visit to Greene’s personal profile on Monday afternoon showed that her tweets were indeed once again visible.
Greene herself has drawn criticism for her support for multiple fringe beliefs, including previously her endorsement of a conspiracy theory that claims the Sandy Hook shooting had been a staged event.
Her account was also observed “liking” social media posts calling for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to be put to death and tweeting that she hoped Pelosi would lose her memory sitting in prison.
The decisions underscore the chaotic and seemingly improvisational management style that has characterised Musk’s ownership of one of the world’s top social media platforms.
Musk’s decision on Jones, issued abruptly and with finality, contrasted sharply with the billionaire’s approach to Trump — which was based on an unscientific Twitter poll whose results Musk tried to portray as the will of the people, even as he suggested the poll was being manipulated by anti-Trump bots while voting was still open.
The account decisions also appear to backtrack on his promises not to make any “main content material choices or account reinstatements” before convening a new content moderation council.
Musk told advertisers during a Twitter Spaces event on November 9 that it could be months before the council meets for the first time.
Musk’s strategy has now raised recent questions from customers in regards to the rubric he’ll use to find out the way forward for particular person suspended accounts — a choice matrix that customers more and more understand as grounded in Musk’s private beliefs and pushed by his whimsy, quite than by goal free-speech ideas or clear phrases of service.